![]() |
|
LOOPOLE, WE HAVE OUR RIGHTS!!! - Printable Version +- heRO-Server Forum (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum) +-- Forum: Game Related (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Help & Support (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=22) +--- Thread: LOOPOLE, WE HAVE OUR RIGHTS!!! (/showthread.php?tid=6474) |
LOOPOLE, WE HAVE OUR RIGHTS!!! - Jaymyster - 06-13-2008 Hey its peppin, Well, as you all know the new SVN has come out. Along with it comes a new non-spam feature WELL, LOOK WHAT I STUMBLED ACROSS ![]() As you can see, i have said ice cream only twice YET, on my THIRD attempt, it says, "You can't type the same word/phrase more than 3 times." WHEN, i havent even reached my 3 time yet!!!! HA I am making this post to have the right to say something A THIRD TIME IN A ROW, THE THIRD TIME HAS THE MOST EMPHASIS. I am serious about this subject, GMs, please reply/fix. (2 ISNT ENOUGH!!!) RE: LOOPOLE, WE HAVE OUR RIGHTS!!! - Zeena - 06-13-2008 Why not just say "ICE CREAM" twice and then come up with something creative, such as "ICE CREAM!"? ;P RE: LOOPOLE, WE HAVE OUR RIGHTS!!! - Aaronock - 06-13-2008 ![]() This issue was already listed I believe in known issues with this SVN if I remember correctly. RE: LOOPOLE, WE HAVE OUR RIGHTS!!! - Fruityla - 06-13-2008 It is indeed and already known issue Personally, I don't think they should fix it as it prevents spamming and could very well be a solution to the spam attack problem =3 Edit: Although, is it just three times in a row or three times in a certain time period? RE: LOOPOLE, WE HAVE OUR RIGHTS!!! - Jaymyster - 06-13-2008 WOW, ITS ONLY 1 MORE 3 times is great!!! 2 times does not feel like enough freedom and technically it isnt 3 times so it either has to be re worded or changed CHANGED PL0X RE: LOOPOLE, WE HAVE OUR RIGHTS!!! - Fruityla - 06-13-2008 Jaymyster Wrote:WOW, ITS ONLY 1 MORE Technicalities are silly x3 RE: LOOPOLE, WE HAVE OUR RIGHTS!!! - GM-Pandora - 06-14-2008 It's in the list of known issues. We may fix it (or maybe not), but either way it's on the low side of the priorities. |