![]() |
|
Baby WoE - Printable Version +- heRO-Server Forum (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum) +-- Forum: Game Related (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Suggestions/Questions (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +--- Thread: Baby WoE (/showthread.php?tid=8332) |
Baby WoE - i.Phan - 12-21-2008 enough said. RE: Baby WoE - The Legendary Joe - 12-21-2008 It's been suggested before,??but there's just not enough active??baby's to warrant it. Hell,??Aldebaran??= Nontrans and??non-extended class woe, and that's oftentime boring because of lack of willing competitors. They all want to chum it up with the Big fish in normal woe. RE: Baby WoE - gorgetrapper - 12-21-2008 No. RE: Baby WoE - GT-Hiro - 12-21-2008 need more babies for baby woe. RE: Baby WoE - GM-Pandora - 12-26-2008 It's been suggested before and we are considering it, however it's not a priority right now, sorry. RE: Baby WoE - Spire - 12-28-2008 How many people would make babies just for baby WoE? I know I would. RE: Baby WoE - Rei Ayanami - 12-28-2008 frankly i dont think there will be enough baby class to do a specific baby class woe. most ppl are more interested in the bounty for the norm woe and their main to even consider making a baby class. besides the downturn is the sp and hp reduction. besides the fact that the woe will be adorably squaking cute (at this point i proly die from heart attack from the cuteness) i don't really see much upside to it that may attract interest. it may however one plus that the event may bring is an incentive to create a violent rainstorm of babies (that analogy sounds horribly wrong to me at the moment, do raise a better one in its place so i may erase mine). |