Religous views

[mahawirasd]

@krimlin>>
i must admit general that i must have overlooked/forgot that passage. However, i still believe that the main reason for his adherence to "god" is to justify his hypotheses...

and yes, luckily Sartre managed to render religion irrelevant to human life. Although sadly people still argue that without religion there is no morality, i find those arguments weak and not compelling enough. We can live in a civil society without making moral standards based on divine beings...


@danny-krins>>
well some do say "ignorance is bliss"...


@herman>>
come now, join the fray...


@lance>>
well the thing is lance, sometimes i think the scientific community becomes too dogmatic that they forget their initial assumptions...
funnily enough, apparently the religious community is also mistaken by thinking that evolution negates creation;
no matter how true evolution is, and even if Urey-Miller were right on target, they still can't negate the possibility that a divine being of some sort created it all in the first place...

due note that that "divine being" may be different from the zoroastrian, christian, jewish, islam, etc conceptions...

the thing why i always stress how inherently incapable man is to actually "know" anything is that because even when religions use "god" as a divine justification, they usually apply an "untouchable" characteristic to that divine being, rendering them unreachable from the realms of man...

we never knew anything, we don't know anything, and we will never know anything...


-w-