Religous views

[teOx]

well the thing is lance, sometimes i think the scientific community becomes too dogmatic that they forget their initial assumptions...
funnily enough, apparently the religious community is also mistaken by thinking that evolution negates creation;
no matter how true evolution is, and even if Urey-Miller were right on target, they still can't negate the possibility that a divine being of some sort created it all in the first place...

due note that that "divine being" may be different from the zoroastrian, christian, jewish, islam, etc conceptions...

does it effectively matter if they cant negate it? if they are right on target there's no evidence nor reason to suspect otherwise basing on empiricism. of course there is no reason to not consider the possibility of a divine being but that alone doesnt justify religion.