Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A> +9 BLB [1]
mahawirasd Offline
Posting Freak
*****

Posts: 3,839
Threads: 50
Joined: Jul 2008
#13
RE: A> +9 BLB [1]
ah, yes, at least someone read that properly. Yes Corp, at the moment that is indeed what i am asking for. Perhaps i need to reiterate that i prefer the upper part of that minimum rather than the lower part.

So to stop this auction from straying, please don't just bid with zeny.
So sorry Trowa and all the others bidding through the zeny route, i did remind you of the initial conditions, as did Aeo and now Corp...

inb4 i understand that some might think that +9 tidals are of more use than +9 slotted BLB, but there are people who prefer the BLB-crest combo to the wool-tidal combo. So this auction is intended for those who are willing to trade in their +9 tidals for the +9 blb[1] because they are more interested in the latter.
and the extra 50m on top of that +9 tidal i think is quite justified considering the calculations i have provided above. Should you or another person feel that he/she is willing to trade in a +9 tidal[1] or one with a firelock card in it but is not willing to add the 50m, you are free to contend a counter-argument to the calculations provided above Ok


-w-
(This post was last modified: 08-03-2010, 08:32 PM by mahawirasd.)
08-03-2010, 08:28 PM
Find Reply


Messages In This Thread
A> +9 BLB [1] - by mahawirasd - 08-02-2010, 12:13 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Shikari - 08-02-2010, 12:30 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Type - 08-02-2010, 02:36 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Stabbity Death - 08-02-2010, 06:50 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by mahawirasd - 08-02-2010, 10:00 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Stabbity Death - 08-03-2010, 04:13 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Aeolian - 08-03-2010, 06:42 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by thecursed - 08-03-2010, 07:51 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Aeolian - 08-03-2010, 10:32 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by takhara - 08-03-2010, 01:39 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by thecursed - 08-03-2010, 06:22 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Corporal - 08-03-2010, 06:41 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by mahawirasd - 08-03-2010, 08:28 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Split Ends - 08-03-2010, 10:17 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Corporal - 08-04-2010, 12:44 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Stabbity Death - 08-04-2010, 01:00 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by mahawirasd - 08-04-2010, 05:24 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Split Ends - 08-07-2010, 05:18 AM
RE:??A> +9 BLB [1] - by Blame - 08-07-2010, 02:03 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Split Ends - 08-07-2010, 02:30 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Poring Slayer - 08-09-2010, 12:32 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by mahawirasd - 08-16-2010, 06:17 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by mahawirasd - 08-16-2010, 06:18 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by VelvetHarlequin - 08-16-2010, 07:50 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Silk - 08-17-2010, 02:44 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Type - 08-17-2010, 05:11 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by mahawirasd - 08-17-2010, 10:21 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by thecursed - 08-18-2010, 01:31 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Type - 08-18-2010, 03:11 PM
RE:??A> +9 BLB [1] - by Herman - 08-19-2010, 12:03 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by proto - 08-18-2010, 05:37 PM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by mahawirasd - 08-19-2010, 06:23 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Herman - 08-20-2010, 01:41 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by mahawirasd - 09-01-2010, 04:31 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by iTz ChaoZ - 09-01-2010, 05:32 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by mahawirasd - 09-25-2010, 08:41 AM
RE: A> +9 BLB [1] - by Shinigami l0_0l - 09-26-2010, 08:11 AM

Forum Jump: